Keith's tweets.......

    follow me on Twitter

    Wednesday, 14 September 2011

    Submission

    I would like to make the following observations.

    According to the Manager's Report there is a surplus of 7 times the
    required zoning for residential development in the current plan.

    With an excess of lands zoned for housing within the boundaries of
    Westport Town Council it is inappropriate for any extra lands to be
    zoned within the boundaries of Westport Town Council for residential
    housing.  Consequently the Manager's recommendation to zone such lands
    north of Westport House estate on the Golf Course Road for residential
    development to provide 90 additional units of housing on 6 hectares of
    land is unsustainable and inappropriate, contrary to good planning and
    practice and should be abandoned. The readiness of Management to
    facilitate the above zoning and its disposal to private developers by
    removing the phasing of the commercial core is contrary to good
    planning and should be abandoned.

    It is contrary to good planning, practise and land use to insert an
    area of development into the area identified as the historic core of
    the estate.  It does not take into consideration proper environmental
    and planning considerations such as the visual amenity, historical and
    heritage importance of the estate or its proximity to Natura 2000
    sites or impact on the listed buildings and structures and their
    curtailage.  The historic core is by its very nature in need of
    preservation from development yet this plan recommends zoning lands
    west Hotel Westport, within the historic core, as being suitable for
    development of tourist related buildings.  This is completely
    inappropriate development in a very sensitive area of the estate.
    Considering the lands removed from the estate by compulsory purchase
    by Westport Town Council in the early 1950s this would constitute a
    further invasion of the town core into the estate indeed into the
    historic core of the estate.  This is unsuitable and inappropriate and
    should be abandoned.  This historic core must be sterilised and
    protected from any new development.  Such a provision would impact
    negatively on the fabric of the overall estate.

    The proposal to allow stand alone buildings within the historic core
    such as a theatre, conference centre, hotel, etc is contrary to good
    planning and practise to zone for such developments.   It does not
    take into consideration proper environmental and planning
    considerations such as the visual amenity, historical and heritage
    importance of the estate or its proximity to Natura 2000 sites or the
    listed buildings and their curtailage.  Any such development would
    destroy the purpose of the zoning of a historic core and would impact
    negatively on the fabric of the estate.

    It is good planning to facilitate the pedestrian links with the estate
    and the town especially in the vicinity of Church Lane.  It is vital
    to the sustainability and viability of the estate that some form of
    vehicular access be provided, on restricted dates, to facilitate the
    smooth and proper development of the estate as a venue for concerts,
    public events and meetings, festivals and fairs which are much more in
    keeping with the estate and are sustainable and do not interfere with
    the fabric of the estate, its heritage or historic value.

    The development of a nursing home in the area known as Colonel's Wood
    should be prevented.  It is an inappropriate development in a woodland
    and the access road is unsuitable.  Any felling in the area must
    result in replanting as the woodland constitutes an important visual
    feature of the town.

    The lands in Monamore/Drummindoo are not on the town sewerage scheme
    or town water supply. The roads in the area are already substandard
    and have no footpaths or street lighting. In the Town Development
    Plan there are no lands specifically zoned for recreation/amenity.
    This area would be best suited to meeting the very real need for such
    lands zonings within the Westport area. Westport already has two
    industrial estates. The zoning of the lands in Monamore/Drummindoo do
    not reflect proper planning practice and are surplus to requirements.


    Councillor Keith Martin
    33 Pairc na Coille
    Westport
    Mayo

    No comments: